Friday 12 June 2015

Cameroon: When Fako Chiefs Become Mischievous



/By Macdonald Ayang Okumb/



Naturally, and as history has shown us, the aura around the Chieftaincy institution, or you may want to call it variously as the Royalty, Monarchy, Dynasty,or the kingdom,everywhere in the world has been and still remains one of exceeding dignity.

     Even in the Holy Scriptures, we see how kings, in the likes of the King Davids, Herods, Nebuchadnezzars, Ahabs, etc., all commanded humongous and immeasurable respect despite their deeds. Let me make a panoramic rush over them.

      King David, for example, was the 2ndking of the Israelites; and as a young shepherd, he fought the proverbial Goliath and killed him by hitting him in the head with a stone. One of his greatest achievements was that he united Israel with Jerusalem as its capital.He was a great man; reason why many of the Psalms in the Bible are attributed to him.

Herod, who was otherwise known as Herod the Great, on his partwas the King of Judea who tried to kill Jesus by ordering the death of all children under age two in Bethlehem. Unfortunately, he didn’t succeed because the angel of the lord hinted Jesus’ parents about the impending danger and so they escaped to Egypt with baby Jesus.

Nebuchadnezzar was the king of Chaldea who captured and destroyed Jerusalem and exiled the Israelites to Babylonia while Ahab was the pagan Israelite king who got married to Jezebel, a nagging, cruel and immoral queen who fostered the worship of Baal and tried to kill Elijah and other prophets of Israel.

      We could go on and on but the above biblical chiefs or kings,despite all the reverence accorded them and the so much power they wielded,apart from King David,stillengaged in very atrocious and mischievous acts. And those who are versed with the scriptures can better tell of their tragic denouement which was obviously the nemesis for their actions.

Back to Fako; I fear that what some of the chiefs have been doing lately is bad enough to be labeled as mischievous and atrocious. In the past couple of months, what has come to be given the coinage as “the Fako land crisis” has stirred enormous controversy, at the heart of which, are these chiefs.   
   Observers hold that issues about the matter have gone so messy such that many are tempted to say that the Fako chieftaincy institution has become more or less the literal Augean stables in Greek mythology.  For those who know, these were extremely dirty stables that were finally cleaned by Hercules, a hero, who diverted two rivers to flow through them.

      TheFakoChiefs’ conference,the largest gathering of traditional rulers in the division,which many expected would act as an antidote to the whole land problem,has insteadproved that it has become the realAugeanstables that it self needs to be cleaned.

   Recently, they (Fako chiefs) held elections under very controversial circumstances during which a new Executivebureau was chosen. Prior to the Elective Assembly, there were press releases and counter-releases about the meeting. While the then incumbent President, ChiefSamuel EpupaEkum, together with some others, described the Muyuka meeting as ‘illegal and unconstitutional’, another faction of chiefs that eventually went ahead to conduct the elections, came up with their justifications as to why the assembly was inevitable. The war of words raged on until the elections finally took place.

What I know is that a house divided within itself can never stand. Fako chiefs cannot pretend to be able to support the administration in the furtherance of peace, security and development in Fako without enjoying the luxury and advantages that come with unity and togetherness. For a long time now, including immediately after the Reunification celebrations in Buea, they have constantly been washing their dirty linen in public.

It’s also no news that most of the chiefs who are now caught in the land crisis web are those who easily tumble to the antics and cunning manoevres of local administrators to sell CDC Surrenderedland and line their pockets at the expense of their subjects for which such lands are destined. If it is not so, why did a number of them (chiefs) storm Yaounde weeks ago to protest the Minister of land’s decision to suspend the registration of CDC ceded land in Fako until further notice?

     Again if not so, why did the newly elected Fako chiefs’ president, Chief Johannes Njie Mokoto, ignominiously say in his interview to the press shortly after his election that the Fakoland grabbing crisis wasa mere ‘illusion’? How can it be an ‘illusion’ when several ministerial investigative missions, including those of the National Anti Corruption Commission, CONAC, have already been to BueaandLimbeseveral times and grilled chiefs as well as other local administrators?

      Would it not have been the place of these chiefs to instead rally under a united front and resist the Machiavellian and sadistic actions of these thieving administrators who are bent on milking the land-juicy Fako division dry?

In the heat of this land grabbing matter, and considering that theyhave been grilled by these various commissions of enquiry from Yaounde, the chiefs have rather spent their time accusing and counter-accusing colleagues of orchestrating mischievous schemes to mislead them from the real issues.

      Truth be told; Fako chiefs have come along way and so cannot afford to allow themselves to be remote-controlled by administrators who will always come and go. But they (chiefs) will remain chiefs of their respective villages until death do them part or abdicate power if they so wish.  This is the fundamental difference between them and the administrators they now tend to be siding with on the land affair, some of them I mean.

      These chiefs cannot continue to treat their own indigenous Fako country as if they are but strangers there.Economists say, and rightly so, that land is a fixed asset and the stack reality is that it doesn’t grow or expand. Thus, don’t they think that conniving with or easily summiting to duress from local administrators to mismanage their community lands is a dangerous step in the direction of subtly mortgaging the future of their coming generations?

      The extreme dignity our chiefs and other traditional rulers hitherto enjoyed, like was the case in the days of the enviable and influential Southern CameroonsHouse of chiefs, must be restored. And they themselves must help in this process.Chiefs must refrain from any form of mischief on their people and consciences. Verily, however, I think that it is not yet late. Now is the time for them to unite, form a common front and fight for what is rightly theirs- their lands. No one is instigating war or genocidelike most of them have erroneously and fallaciously said in press releases all the while. Long live the chieftaincy institution.


No comments:

Post a Comment